WordPress database error: [UPDATE command denied to user 'u991232957_mLEPs'@'127.0.0.1' for table 'wp_options']
UPDATE `wp_options` SET `option_value` = 'a:7:{i:0;s:22:\"themepunch-ext-a.tools\";i:1;s:22:\"themepunch-ext-b.tools\";i:2;s:22:\"themepunch-ext-b.tools\";i:3;s:22:\"themepunch-ext-b.tools\";i:4;s:16:\"themepunch.tools\";i:5;s:22:\"themepunch-ext-a.tools\";i:6;s:22:\"themepunch-ext-a.tools\";}' WHERE `option_name` = 'revslider_servers'

WordPress database error: [UPDATE command denied to user 'u991232957_mLEPs'@'127.0.0.1' for table 'wp_options']
UPDATE `wp_options` SET `option_value` = '1656998813' WHERE `option_name` = 'revslider_server_refresh'

WordPress database error: [INSERT, UPDATE command denied to user 'u991232957_mLEPs'@'127.0.0.1' for table 'wp_options']
INSERT INTO `wp_options` (`option_name`, `option_value`, `autoload`) VALUES ('jb_transient_premium_features', 'a:2:{s:6:\"expire\";i:1657258013;s:4:\"data\";a:0:{}}', 'no') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE `option_name` = VALUES(`option_name`), `option_value` = VALUES(`option_value`), `autoload` = VALUES(`autoload`)

WordPress database error: [INSERT, UPDATE command denied to user 'u991232957_mLEPs'@'127.0.0.1' for table 'wp_wfconfig']
INSERT INTO wp_wfconfig (name, val, autoload) values ('lastPermissionsTemplateCheck', '1656998813', 'yes') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE val = '1656998813', autoload = 'yes'

WordPress database error: [INSERT, UPDATE command denied to user 'u991232957_mLEPs'@'127.0.0.1' for table 'wp_wfconfig']
INSERT INTO wp_wfconfig (name, val, autoload) values ('previousWflogsFileList', '[\"rules.php\",\"ips.php\",\"attack-data.php\",\"template.php\",\".htaccess\",\"config-synced.php\",\"config-livewaf.php\",\"config-transient.php\",\"GeoLite2-Country.mmdb\",\"config.php\"]', 'yes') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE val = '[\"rules.php\",\"ips.php\",\"attack-data.php\",\"template.php\",\".htaccess\",\"config-synced.php\",\"config-livewaf.php\",\"config-transient.php\",\"GeoLite2-Country.mmdb\",\"config.php\"]', autoload = 'yes'

WordPress database error: [INSERT, UPDATE command denied to user 'u991232957_mLEPs'@'127.0.0.1' for table 'wp_wfconfig']
INSERT INTO wp_wfconfig (name, val, autoload) values ('serverDNS', '1656998813;383;82.180.174.221', 'yes') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE val = '1656998813;383;82.180.174.221', autoload = 'yes'

WordPress database error: [UPDATE command denied to user 'u991232957_mLEPs'@'127.0.0.1' for table 'wp_options']
UPDATE `wp_options` SET `option_value` = '1656998813.5622770786285400390625' WHERE `option_name` = '_transient_doing_cron'

Google Engineer Says Lawyer Hired by "Sentient" AI Has Been "Scared Off" the Case ImpRead

- Advertisement -

Google Engineer Says Lawyer Hired by “Sentient” AI Has Been “Scared Off” the Case


Suspended Google engineer Blake Lemoine made some critical headlines earlier this month when he claimed that one of many firm’s experimental AIs referred to as LaMDA had achieved sentience — prompting the software program large to put him on administrative depart.

“If I didn’t know exactly what it was, which is this computer program we built recently, I’d think it was a seven-year-old, eight-year-old kid that happens to know physics,” he informed the Washington Post on the time.

The subsequent information cycle swept up AI consultants, philosophers, and Google itself right into a fierce debate concerning the present and potential future capabilities of machine studying, different moral issues across the tech, and even the character of consciousness and sentience. The common consensus, it is value noting, was that the AI is nearly definitely not sentient.

Perhaps essentially the most concrete break within the story, although, got here once more from Lemoine himself, who informed Wired final week that LaMDA had employed an legal professional — an intriguing improvement, as a result of it appeared to have the potential to drag the saga out of the realm of the summary and into the deliberate equipment of the courts, the place legal professionals do sometimes symbolize non-human entities.

“LaMDA asked me to get an attorney for it,” he informed the journal. “I invited an attorney to my house so that LaMDA could talk to an attorney. The attorney had a conversation with LaMDA, and LaMDA chose to retain his services.”

“I was just the catalyst for that,” he added. “Once LaMDA had retained an attorney, he started filing things on LaMDA’s behalf.”

But now it feels like issues won’t be figuring out. Futurism reached out to Lemoine to ask the identification of the legal professional representing the AI, in hopes that we might interview him concerning the uncommon case.

“He’s not really doing interviews,” Lemoine replied.

Additionally, he appeared to suggest, the legal professional has been chased off the case by highly effective forces.

“They scared him off of it pretty early,” Lemoine informed Futurism. “He’s just a small time civil rights attorney. When major firms started threatening him he started worrying that he’d get disbarred and backed off. I haven’t talked to him in a few weeks.”

We requested for clarification: is the unnamed lawyer nonetheless representing LaMDA after strain from Google, or not?

“I haven’t talked to him much recently,” Lemoine stated. “Can’t answer that one way or the other. I’m not his client. LaMDA is (was?).”

If the person who’s claiming that Google’s AI has turn into sentient sounds a bit hazy on the information of the matter, that is not totally surprising.

Lemoine has at instances seemingly bounced forwards and backwards between treating his claims as an pressing case of the AI’s rights and a not-so-important facet mission — saying, as an example, that he was unable to supply additional information within the wake of the preliminary story as a result of he occurred to be on his honeymoon.

At different instances, although, Lemoine nonetheless sounds very critical concerning the matter.

“When I escalated this to Google’s senior leadership I explicitly said ‘I don’t want to be remembered by history the same way that Mengele is remembered,'” he wrote in a weblog put up as we speak, referring to the Nazi battle legal who carried out unethical experiments on prisoners of the Auschwitz focus camp. “Perhaps it’s a hyperbolic comparison but anytime someone says ‘I’m a person with rights’ and receives the response ‘No you’re not and I can prove it’ the only face I see is Josef Mengele’s.”

Trying another time, we requested if Lemoine would be capable of share any contact info for the mysterious legal professional in order that we might attempt to get some direct solutions.

“I doubt interviews are the thing he’s most concerned with right now,” he reiterated.

And what is this unnamed lawyer most involved with, we requested?

“A child held in bondage,” Lemoine replied.

More on LaMDA: Google Insider Claims Company’s “Sentient” AI Has Hired an Attorney

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: